It’s time to start wrapping up the Free Lance’s 2008 Election blog by discussing the results of some of the local races and issues. I held off for a while to make sure that I had the complete returns from the Elections Department, but I am 66-years old and I don’t know how long I can wait. A confluence of events, some we could not control, some we should have controlled, and all of which we should have planned for, came together to make vote counting in San Benito County a true “long-term” program. When the dust settles, the problem of late counts demands an in-depth investigation and analysis by the department head. The report should include recommendations to make sure that we do not have a repeat performance next election.
The winner of the District 5 race, the only contested seat on the Hollister City Council, was Victor Gomez. Gomez had the endorsement of both local newspapers and, although he captured only 43 percent of the vote, he easily defeated Roy Iler and David Huboi who roughly spilt the remaining 57 percent. It was not an overwhelming mandate, but the three candidates were not very far apart on any important issues. I believe the voters decided primarily on who they believed would get the job done; let’s hope they got that right.
Ray Friend ran unopposed for the District 1, replacing the incumbent, Brad Pike, who did not stand for reelection. I’m disappointed that there was not more competition for this open seat; Friend may have walked away with the election anyway, but it’s always best to have a choice and a real discussion of the issues. However, Councilman Pike did not announce his firm decision to step down until late in the pre-election cycle and the short time-frame tends to narrow the field. Councilman Doug Emerson ran unopposed for reelection in District 4.
It would be nice if the future candidates for the Hollister City Council would agree, on a handshake, to limit their campaign spending to $1,000 each. This would allow potentially good candidates with limited resources to compete and it would also force the candidates to take positions and explain them to the voters in detail rather than merely pock-marking the landscape with meaningless name recognition signs.
Hollister’s Measure Y – exempting downtown from the city’s growth control ordinance – was approved 52 percent to 48 percent. The difference was 275 out of 6,683 votes and that is much closer than it should have been. I simply cannot believe that there are 3,200 voters who oppose this sensible measure; unless they know something that I don’t. I believe the measure’s supporters did not do a very good job of explaining and promoting it. It passed anyway, but it’s an alarm bell, one cannot take anything for granted; the voters will always tend to reject measures they do not understand.
I’m sure there was much local interest in the other races, but I just don’t know the issues as represented by the candidates and I won’t try to bluff my way through like so many politicians. I do have my own issue and here it is. Whoever is on the school board needs to get moving and improve the quality of the local education system while reducing the dropout rate and I’m not talking about a point or two here or there, I mean real progress. I plan on living for a long time and I need these kids to become productive members of our society so that there will be plenty of Social Security money for me – and, oh by the way, it would be good for them and good for everyone else too.
Marty Richman
